TUT ANKH AMUN - HIEROGLYPH TRANSLATION

 

Tut ankh Amun
twt-Ꜥnḫ-imn
The living image of Amun
i-mn:n-t&w&t-anx

Nominum - Touching - Conscious
"Translating something"

 

Tut ankh Amun heqa Iunu shemai
twt-Ꜥnḫ-imn ḥḳꜢ-iwnw-šmꜤi
The living image of Amun, ruler of southern Heliopolis
i-mn:n-t&w&t-anx-HqA-iwn-Sma

Nominum - Touching - Conscious, Control, Established (Known) Idea Or Thinking, Many Hands / Along A line
"Translating something passed down"

Tut ankh Aton
twt-Ꜥnḫ-itn
The living image of Aton
i-t:n:ra-t&w&t-anx-n:x

Detail - Touching - Conscious, Understanding
Clarify Something or Bring Understanding

Circle with a dot in the middle means "Mind"
Circle with 3 lines in the middle means "Understanding"
 

Sphinx Come In Pairs

Sphinx come in pairs

You will rarely ever see a Sphinx alone

If I'm correct there should be at least one other Sphinx buried in the sand of Giza. Approx South-Southwest of the Great Sphinx

Though there may/might be more at a site like Giza

Even the tablet on the chest of the Great Sphinx depicts 2 Sphinx. Not one

Because historically you will almost never, if never, see Sphinx guarding something in any less than a pair

There is always at least 2

Water Data Storage

You should be able to store data (including binary) in water using resonant oscillation. Asign frequency keys to data allocations (files) and put them into the water through a dipole frequency relay set to entry only. You should then be able to use the frequency key on the dipole frequency relay set to exit only to retrieve the data

Storage would be near unlimited

I have a theory that "stored data" within water could be a universal constant free from the confines of things such as time due to its design as the bridge between all things in this world (water and electricity are actually the inverse versions of each other) ...

This means theoretically, if I'm correct, I could store data at some stage in the future at a particular point and place, to be accessed in the past, knowing that I would put the data there to be collected in the future, by my present-day self

As long as the sun in the sky is the same sun, the water should hold the data/memory in perpetuity across time, in both directions

Even if water only appears to be the bridge that it is, it would carry over to the actual intangible bridge by necessity of stability in its design

This means you should be able to code your own genes and future without contest, as long as you are aware of your past position to your future-self, as a bio-electrical machine more capable of resonantly encoding water than any technology we could ever dream of (any technological transcendence merely propagates greater levels/degrees of cellular complexity

The only important key, is understanding your place in all things

You can just as easily destroy yourself with the understanding as you could create yourself

Omnipotence is in equalisation

Thor Meaning/Comparison

Asgardur = Intelligence
Thor = Thought
Mjolnir = Movement
Heimdall = Information
Aesir = Conscious
Asynjur = Consciousness

Asgardur is the same word and meaning as Annunaki. Intelligence

Thor is the same word and meaning as Egyptian: Thoth. Thought

Aesir is the same word and meaning as Sumerian: Enki. Couscous

Enki Ea = Couscous Thought. Therefore Ea parallels Thor/Thoth

Asynjur is the same word and meaning as Sumerian: Enlil. Consciousness

Apply the meanings and the stories start to make more sense

"Thought" lives in "Intelligence" and brings "movement" (animate life)

Number Variants - 30th May 2019

00 = Out

01 = Go

02 = Do

03 = Be

04 = So

05 = If

06 = Is

07 = As

08 = A

09 = In

10 = An

11 = And

12 = I

13 = It

14 = Or

15 = At

Numbers - March 2020

Number Meanings (Symbols)

0 - Surround

1 - Open

2 - Close

3 - Between

4 - Before

5 - After

6 - Exit

7 - Even

8 - Equal

9 - Enter

10 - Contain

Bradie 💞

When you understand the meaning of symbols we use for numbers well enough (and their application to each other) you can start to "read" strings of numbers to get words/messages out of them

Random strings of numbers are actually far less random than you think they are

Many times I read strings of numbers and I have to stop and think for a second, whether or not the person/people who used the number where/are aware of the string of numbers they used/chose/choose/use

They aren't of course. Most people do it without realising. Which means that they probably also understand the strings of numbers without consciously realising they do ...

Or can

Example of number meanings application to each other would/can be/is

6 - Exit

16 - Exiting

9 - Enter

19 - Entering

1 - Opens something which is 10 - Contain which denotes a process of relation similar to action

Hence "Enter" becomes "Entering" and "Exit" becomes "Exiting", or in the written version of the words "-een" is added onto the words such as sixt-een (possessive extraction) and nineteen/nin-een/nine-en (possessive contraction)

The written (and pronounced) numbers are/were very specifically chosen because of their meanings

If you sound out the pronunciation of "Six" and/or "Nine" differently you will see/hear that they are very literally pronounced "Exit" and/or "Enter"

Six == Exit

Nine == Enter

Six-teen == Exit-ing

Nine-teen == Enter-ing

Teen - Ing

3 - Between == 13 - Inbetween

See how the words align with the written version of the number symbols?

O-ne == O-pen

Two == Close

Thr-ee == Bet-ween

OK, now try reversing them and you will find that backwards they match/work as well

enO == Open

owT == Close

eerhT == Between

ruoF == Before

eviF == After

If a word or number works both backwards and forwards this is how you know you have a applicable match

Doesn't mean that it is definitively the most correct match, but it is a match

The nature of our ability to apply/vary the meaning across numbers/letters to convey meaning within our language and communication means that there are/is not just one "correct match" for any individual/combination of letters/numbers, there are many

This is algorithm

It has to be this way to allow the comprehension within the algorithm

For example, understanding the basic/implied meaning of a word you've never heard before when it is used

From the sequencing of lettering and words it is used in, you can usually deduce within the algorithm what the word (likely) means

This is how people learn multiple languages so easily. The more languages they know, the quicker/easier it becomes to learn another

Algorithm

1 - Open may/might be perspective of self, hence "I" ... ( notice the correlating/correlation between 1/I )

Or 1 may/might be the origin or "nucleus" of something it's being/been/is applied to. Or it can determine the tense/timing within something such as the "being/been/is" I used in this sentence

This is why the figure we know as number 1, is essential a line going between the outside of a circle to its centre point. With a line underscoring the bottom to show it refers to the outside of a circle and a line pointing inward on one side of the top to show it's referring to the middle of that circle

It's the centre/nucleus of something referred to, either possessive(ly) or non-possessive

The symbol for number 2 is a arch which closes out to a line underneath, which once again symbolises the outside of a circle, except this time it is the outer limit of that circle. The oculus in perspective. Where something closes out "to/two"

The symbol for your number 3 literally shows something turning in both directions, but more importantly something centred in between a duality which could be in/out, left/right, open/close. It's simple applicant (in my understanding) is to convey something being between two points

When you go into the mathematical application to the rule of 5, then it seems it most definitely symbolises being between something, the action of moving between, or relating things to each other

Another correlating factor supporting these symbol meanings being correct is symbol for the Om, which appears/seems to be another way of writing 1, 2, 3, which places the number 3 where it technically should be, both after 1 and 2, as well as "between" them by writing/drawing/depicting them in/as a pyramid

The top part of the Om is the centre and outside of a circle, another form of the number 1

The left part of the Om is obviously in its relation to the number 3

And the right part of the Om shows the outside of a circle, another form of the number 2

1, 2, 3

Or

1, 3, 2

Does this mean that my number meanings are correct?

It means they match and have many differing aspects (and directions) of evidence to support that they are likely correct

It doesn't mean that they are definitively correct as by their nature there is and cannot be such a thing, beyond what they were intended to mean originally (and who's to say even that is definitively correct?)

But what is being offered or taught to us about the symbolic origins of our numbers, lettering and languages as a alternative?

I don't think/feel/believe that I am wrong. But if I am, I would love for someone to come forward and teach how

Bradie 💞