Numbers - March 2020

Number Meanings (Symbols)

0 - Surround

1 - Open

2 - Close

3 - Between

4 - Before

5 - After

6 - Exit

7 - Even

8 - Equal

9 - Enter

10 - Contain

Bradie 💞

When you understand the meaning of symbols we use for numbers well enough (and their application to each other) you can start to "read" strings of numbers to get words/messages out of them

Random strings of numbers are actually far less random than you think they are

Many times I read strings of numbers and I have to stop and think for a second, whether or not the person/people who used the number where/are aware of the string of numbers they used/chose/choose/use

They aren't of course. Most people do it without realising. Which means that they probably also understand the strings of numbers without consciously realising they do ...

Or can

Example of number meanings application to each other would/can be/is

6 - Exit

16 - Exiting

9 - Enter

19 - Entering

1 - Opens something which is 10 - Contain which denotes a process of relation similar to action

Hence "Enter" becomes "Entering" and "Exit" becomes "Exiting", or in the written version of the words "-een" is added onto the words such as sixt-een (possessive extraction) and nineteen/nin-een/nine-en (possessive contraction)

The written (and pronounced) numbers are/were very specifically chosen because of their meanings

If you sound out the pronunciation of "Six" and/or "Nine" differently you will see/hear that they are very literally pronounced "Exit" and/or "Enter"

Six == Exit

Nine == Enter

Six-teen == Exit-ing

Nine-teen == Enter-ing

Teen - Ing

3 - Between == 13 - Inbetween

See how the words align with the written version of the number symbols?

O-ne == O-pen

Two == Close

Thr-ee == Bet-ween

OK, now try reversing them and you will find that backwards they match/work as well

enO == Open

owT == Close

eerhT == Between

ruoF == Before

eviF == After

If a word or number works both backwards and forwards this is how you know you have a applicable match

Doesn't mean that it is definitively the most correct match, but it is a match

The nature of our ability to apply/vary the meaning across numbers/letters to convey meaning within our language and communication means that there are/is not just one "correct match" for any individual/combination of letters/numbers, there are many

This is algorithm

It has to be this way to allow the comprehension within the algorithm

For example, understanding the basic/implied meaning of a word you've never heard before when it is used

From the sequencing of lettering and words it is used in, you can usually deduce within the algorithm what the word (likely) means

This is how people learn multiple languages so easily. The more languages they know, the quicker/easier it becomes to learn another

Algorithm

1 - Open may/might be perspective of self, hence "I" ... ( notice the correlating/correlation between 1/I )

Or 1 may/might be the origin or "nucleus" of something it's being/been/is applied to. Or it can determine the tense/timing within something such as the "being/been/is" I used in this sentence

This is why the figure we know as number 1, is essential a line going between the outside of a circle to its centre point. With a line underscoring the bottom to show it refers to the outside of a circle and a line pointing inward on one side of the top to show it's referring to the middle of that circle

It's the centre/nucleus of something referred to, either possessive(ly) or non-possessive

The symbol for number 2 is a arch which closes out to a line underneath, which once again symbolises the outside of a circle, except this time it is the outer limit of that circle. The oculus in perspective. Where something closes out "to/two"

The symbol for your number 3 literally shows something turning in both directions, but more importantly something centred in between a duality which could be in/out, left/right, open/close. It's simple applicant (in my understanding) is to convey something being between two points

When you go into the mathematical application to the rule of 5, then it seems it most definitely symbolises being between something, the action of moving between, or relating things to each other

Another correlating factor supporting these symbol meanings being correct is symbol for the Om, which appears/seems to be another way of writing 1, 2, 3, which places the number 3 where it technically should be, both after 1 and 2, as well as "between" them by writing/drawing/depicting them in/as a pyramid

The top part of the Om is the centre and outside of a circle, another form of the number 1

The left part of the Om is obviously in its relation to the number 3

And the right part of the Om shows the outside of a circle, another form of the number 2

1, 2, 3

Or

1, 3, 2

Does this mean that my number meanings are correct?

It means they match and have many differing aspects (and directions) of evidence to support that they are likely correct

It doesn't mean that they are definitively correct as by their nature there is and cannot be such a thing, beyond what they were intended to mean originally (and who's to say even that is definitively correct?)

But what is being offered or taught to us about the symbolic origins of our numbers, lettering and languages as a alternative?

I don't think/feel/believe that I am wrong. But if I am, I would love for someone to come forward and teach how

Bradie 💞