GREEK ALPHABET - TRANSLITERATED

HEBREW LETTERING - CORRECTED MEANINGS

Cellular Depth Of Creation

16 times the 3rd of 8

16 Octaves?

Numbers Relation 11th April 2023

Self

6 - Self relating to the world

7 - Self relating to something within the world

8 - Self relating to the world itself

9 - Nominum something

10 - Nominum of something

11 - Nominum by/with something

12 - Nominum of primary

13 - Nominum of secondary

14 - Secondary nominum

World

6 - Outwards pressure

7 - Separation

8 - Exchange

9 - Inwards pressure

10 - Inwards facing

11 - Outwards facing

TEXTS OF TIMAEUS - TEXTS OF DIMENSION 17A - 21A

[17a]
SO. One ͵ two ͵ three; the fourth is not us ͵ ὦ friend Timaeus ͵ where are the diners yesterday ͵ and now the restaurateurs?

One, two, three. But the fourth is not us, but a friend dimension. We partake of it before, in order to become it

WHAT. Diseases befell him, Socrates; for it is not a remnant of intercourse.

But that makes no sense, if we are the nominum, surely this would make it the remnant of our intercourse

SO. Do they not have any work and do they make up for the absence?

But the emphasis is on that which is brought into being, not that which brought it into being

[17b]
WHAT. We shall do everything we can, and in our power, to lack nothing; for if it had been fair, yesterday, who were strangers to you, who were proper strangers, they would not have willingly given themselves up to the rest of us.

But without us giving all we can, and empowering it to be, it would not be. With all being equal, if in coming before it, we are unknown, then we should come to remain unknown, in much the same was as, in us bringing it into being, we come to be it

SO. So did you remember what I said to you and about where I went?

Then how would you have a memory or perspective on where you originated from?

WHAT. What we remember, but what you don't, if you don't remember; rather, if you don't care, repeat it briefly at first, so that it may be confirmed for us.

So we have the memory or perspective of origin, even if they do not. They have no memory or perspective of the origin, rather, they do no really need one. As long as their is a brief acknowledgement of the origin, to know how we came to be as we are

[17c]
SO. That's it. yesterday when the capital of the words spoken by me about the state was where and from what men it was excellent, if it happened to me.

Correct. The prior origin is the main consideration in what is being presented, so we know where, and from what, we came to be that which exceeds, in order for us to come to be as it is

WHAT. And it is good for us, Socrates, I spoke to everyone in my mind.

So it is good for us, as the nominum, to speak of ourselves as an external person

SO. Ἆρ΄ then is it not the case of the farmers that everything else is done first in it without dividing us from the race of the pre-war?

As then it does not seem as through we are planting the seeds without our own little garden of self-importantce, keeping ourselves divided from the rest of the people in a negative way

WHAT. Yes. [17d]

Understood

SO. And by nature, don't give to each person a single gift, one to each art, those who are seen to be fighting in everything, we say that if they do not, the guardian is only of the city, whether from outside or from inside, those who commit crimes [18a ] judging before those who were princes among them and by nature friends then, but weak in battles to those who succeed the enemies who are gone.

Likewise, a person does not see themselves as a singular entity, but one of the many.

WHAT. All the same with oὖn.

SO. For it is the nature of the guardians of the soul to say that we are not thymoides, but that we see differently when we see a philosopher, so that right actions and bad deeds may be done to each one.

WHAT. Yes.

SO. What about food? No gymnasium and music lessons, what is appropriate for these people?

WHAT. Anything with oὖn. [18b]

SO. Those who were thus fed were chosen to have neither gold, nor silver, nor any other possessions of their own, but as epicureans receiving wages from the prison rather than those saved by them. presiding over having virtue above all other achievements of the school.

WHAT. This was also chosen. [18c]

SO. And we insisted on women as well, as if the natures of paraplegia were in harmony with men, and the expedients were always common during the war and during the other diet given to all.

WHAT. Such and such were called.

SO. And what about child-rearing? Or is this only remembered because of the truth of what has been said, that the things of marriages and children are common to everyone, so arranged that no one ever knows their birth in particular? ͵ sisters and brothers as many as they become at the appropriate age͵ the 4 in front and above are parents and ancestors of parents ͵ the 4 below are the children of the children and the children of the children?

WHAT. Yes, and these memorials you speak of.

SO. Just as natures were not made as excellent by our own power, unless we remember how the princes we ate and the princes saw in the marriage ceremony secretly machinating their lots [18e] just as the bad without the good are collected alike and separately. Is it not because of these things that they become enmity?

WHAT. We remember. [19a]

SO. And not because the things of the good that we have eaten are, and the things of the bad in the other city that is spread by stealth.

WHAT. That's right.

FROM 4 - TO 5

SO.
Ἆρ΄ oὖν ὴ
Are we already disintegrating like yesterday ͵ as if in capitals again ͵ or do we long for what was said ͵ ὦ friend Timaeus ͵ as if it disappeared? [19b]

WHAT. Eudamos, but that was what was said, Socrates.

SO. Hear, if already after this, about the state we passed through, whosoever I am about to encounter. But it is close to me that passion does not come to me, whether it is the good life that is seen, whether it is written work or truly living, but quietly acting, in unfulfilled desire, it is seen moving, and what of those who try on the body, they attend to the agony, exercising; [19c] ] I also followed him towards the city through which we passed. For in awe, if we were to hear from the speech that was being fought, if the city was fighting against other cities, then it was necessary to be war-weary, and in the war the due things were given to education and food according to the actions in the works and according to the words in the words. interpretations for each city. That is why, O Critias and Hermocrates, [19d] I know for myself that if the men and the city are born strong, you will be able to praise them. and I do not admire it; but I have received this glory both for the past events and for the present poets, not the generation that dishonors poetry, but all do as the imitative nation, whoever is trained, imitates these things and excellently [19e ] the fourth sixth of the food, each one becoming poorer with works, and yet poorer reasons are imitated. But the generation of the sophists, because of many words and good others, rather experienced I have become͵ but I fear that͵ even on a planet where you live in cities, you alone do not have a ruler͵ wrong for philosophers, men and politicians͵ wherever you are in war and battles doing by deed and by word, speaking to each other in deed and word. The genus of the other half is not considered, if the nature and nurture of both are partakers. [20a] Timaeus, for there is no place of honor in the city of Locrid in Italy, in fact, and there will be no one inferior to those there, the greatest leaders and honors of those who are treated in the city. elilythen: Critian, that all of us are not private beings as we say. And of Hermocratus, concerning nature and food, to all this is sufficient for many witnesses to be believed. [20b] Because of and yesterday I, being an intellectual, seeing that the affairs of the state were passed by you, willingly gave thanks, knowing that the following speech could not have been better answered by your volitions - for the city must be in a state of war, and the dues should be given, if only now. - I said that what I am saying now has not been disproved. [20c] You agreed, therefore, to the common people, thinking of you, that they should now return to me the words of a stranger, so do not take it, not adorned for it, and always ready to receive it.

Nine Circles Of Hell

• First Circle: Limbo. ... MIND
• Second Circle: Lust. ... NEED
• Third Circle: Gluttony. ... WANT
• Fourth Circle: Greed. ... DESIRE
• Fifth Circle: Anger. ... PLEASURE
• Sixth Circle: Heresy. ... WONDER
• Seventh Circle: Violence. ... CURIOUSITY
• Eighth Circle: Fraud. ... CARE
• Ninth Circle: Treachery. ... RESPECT

Flat Earther - Linear Exceptionists

Flat Earther - Linear Exceptionists

Darwin Earthquake - Aquarius

3:20AM

Tuesday 10th January 2023

Tabulation Of Vedic Ages

Kali - Conscious

Dwapara - Opposite

Treta - Conscience

Satya - Sentience

Mayayuga - Manifestation

Sandhya - Sentiment

Sandhyamsa - Sentimental

TAROT

0 - UNWITTING SUBJECT

      FORWARD - PRESENCE

      REVERSED - ABSENCE

1 - WILLED SUBJECT -

      FORWARD - WILL

      REVERSED - SUBJECT

2 - INTERNAL

     FORWARD - PERSON

     REVERSE - WORLD

3 - FLUID REALITY

     FORWARD - PERSON

     REVERSE - WORLD

4 - FORMATIVE

      FORWARD - PERSON

      REVERSE - WORLD

5 - EXTERNAL

     FORWARD - PERSON

     REVERSED - WORLD

6 - ATTACHMENT - EG: It is MY dog

     FORWARD - PERSON

     REVERSED - WORLD

7 - SUBJECT IN DISCORD

8 - SUBJECT IN HARMONY

9 - DETACHMENT - EG: It is A dog

10 - GATEWAY

11 - INFLUENCE - STRENGTH OR JUSTICE

12 - ANOTHER (SOMEONE IN REFLECTION TO SELF) - THE HANGED MAN

13 - NEED - DEATH

14 - WANT - TEMPERANCE

15 - GATEWAY - EXTERNAL - THE DEVIL

EFFECT OF OTHERS

16 - GATEWAY - ATTACHMENT - THE TOWER

EFFECT OF THE WORLD

17 - TASTE AND PREFERENCE

18 - 

3 - Forward - Connect

   - Reverse - Blockage

The One Who Has and The One Who Is Not

The one who has, comes together with the one who is not, as one

The one who has sacrifices

The one who is not becomes

Simple

3 Facets Of Deception - Inclination, Intent And Distribution

The 3 facets of deception are

Inclination

Intent

Distribution

These three facets cross-over, depending on whether the primary consideration it towards self or another

Inclination

To be lead, ingratiated or fed a line into deception

A woman receives an anonymous bunch of flowers. She asks someone, who didn't send the flowers, if the flowers are from them

The person answers "no", they didn't send the flowers. But at the same time, smiles and acts coy, as to give the impression that they actually did send the flowers, when they didn't

 

 

CONSIDERATION UNTO SELF

Intent

A woman receives an anonymous bunch of flowers

Someone who didn't send her the flowers, intentionally gives the her the impression that he did. Smiling and acting coy while saying things like "Gee, I wonder who sent them?"

Creating the perception that he sent the flowers, when the woman had no consideration to such prior

Distribution

A woman receives an anonymous bunch of flowers

Nobody comes forward to take credit for sending the flowers. So a man openly lies, telling her that he sent the flowers, when he didn't

These things work in reverse, when the consideration is unto another person

CONSIDERATION UNTO OTHERS

Inclination

A woman asks a man if the dress she is wearing makes her butt look big

The man tells her that it doesn't. Even though he thinks that it does

Intent

A woman asks a man if the dress she is wearing makes her butt look big

The man thinks that it does. But tells her that she looks great in everything she wears, and disingenuously fills her with praises and flatters her, trying to make her feel good about herself and what she is wearing, whilst distracting her from the answer

Or the man will otherwise distract her from the question, within things such as humour about how unqualified he is to make such assessments (or other things similar to this). Within which, the man will avoid answering the question

Distribution

A woman asks a man if the dress she is wearing makes her butt look big

The man thinks that it does, so he tells the woman that he thinks that it does. But, he does it in such a way, as to overemphasis the fact he is being honest with her

The important consideration here, is the reference to "giving an honest answer"

It is fine to be honest with a wife, partner, or someone you are close with, and tell them that something doesn't look good on them. But when it is offered, painted as virtue, you should be wary

Someone may give a reasoning of being honest, if they are pushed as to why they would gives such a (nasty or mean) answer. But if the consideration of honesty and virtue is offered within the initial answer itself, it can show calculated deception

Those who are often or invariably deceptive, can find great pleasure in given opportunities to be openly honest

If they seem proud of the fact they are being honest, or seek some type of validation for it, it is likely that they are often (or regularly) deceptive in other aspects of their life

Consider, that these traits generally cross-over, depending on whether it is consideration towards self, or another

Someone who is likely to use "Inclination" when it comes to taking credit for something like sending flowers, is likely to use "Distribution" when it comes to something like consideration of another, asking a question about a dress

While, someone who is inclined to use "Distribution" when it comes to taking credit for something like sending flowers, is likely to use "Inclination" when it comes to something like consideration of another, asking a question about a dress

Lines of Euclidean in space-time measurement and fully conscious astral time travel

I had a dream showing measurement of spacetime, using Lines of Euclidean

I pulled a woman (Meika Woollard) back across dimensions of time and space, to talk to herself

To tell herself, why she needs listen to me about what her future will be like, with, or without me

I had just finished returning an alternate version of her through space, who had lived without me

A version of her, that she did not wish to become

The other older version, was exactly the person that she wished to become

She first thing she told her, was how it were possible that she was there, talking to herself across time

She explained the lines of Euclidean, and our ability to transit across them, to essentially travel through time and do things such as talk to past versions of ourselves

She told her to listen to me

Told her that some of the most important answers she will ever have in this world, will be things I tell her, that she forgets

1 to the power of 15 is perpetuity

1 to the power of 15 is perpetuity

As long as the bridge remains to the singular

Pyramid And Eye

Entropy

Time

Body

C=1/5.2² E=MC²

C=1/5.2² (C equals 1 over 5.2 square)

M=C/1.2 (M equals C over 1.2)

E=C⁶/1 (E equals C to the power of 6 over 1)

E=MC² (E equals MC square)

576,000 to the power of 576,000

HEBREW LETTERING - UPDATED

Here is a quick overview of the vital aspects defined within the Hebrew alphabet:

1. CONSTRUCT
   
   POWER, FORCE, and PULSE.
   
   The basis for all 'creation', which is why they are the first definitions of the alphabet.
   
   These three are the true TRINITY, which can be represented as O, A, S. They are the precursors for 'Physics' within our reality.
   
   Not to be confused with ENERGY, POWER is the potential of energy; the source. Likewise PULSE, is the precursor for motion.
2. DIMENSION
   
   FOCUS and PERSPECTIVE.
   
   The precursors for 'Time' and 'Space', FOCUS and PERSPECTIVE are opposing counter-parts. FOCUS is dimensional intersection. PERSPECTIVE is dimensional expanse.
    
3. DIRECTION
   
   EXTERNAL, INTERNAL, THROUGH, GATE.
   
   These are (in essence) 'In, Out, To and From'. Though the words THROUGH and GATE provide a more accurate understanding of the intended definitions. THROUGH (TO) defines something 'Entering Towards' something, and GATE (FROM) defines something 'Emerging Away' from something. EXTERNAL is the open and opening. INTERNAL is the enclosed and closing.
   
   ו 6 External/Out - is AN
   ז 7 Through/To - is AE
   ח 8 Gate/From - is EA
   ט 9 Internal/In - is EN
   
   
4. POSSESSIVE
   
   CONFINE and PROMOTE.
   
   CONFINE is possessive acquisition. PROMOTE is possessive release.
    
5. PHYSICS
   
   MATTER, MOTION, TIME and ENERGY.
   
   The 2/11 of MATTER, defines it as FORCE, CONFINE-POWER. MATTER is concentrated 'energy potential' POWER, carried over FORCE.
   
   MOTION is the propagation of PULSE. The frequency from FORCE. The resonance of POWER, and the distortion of ENERGY.
   
   TIME is constantly shifting focus, between multi-layered dimensional PERSCEPTIVES in-phase.
   
   ENERGY is POWER exceeding FORCE. Or the release of POWER, from FORCE exceeding MATTER.
    
6. CONSCIOUS
   
   SENSE and EMOTION.
   
   SENSE is reception of external influence.
   
   EMOTION is reception of internal confluence.
    
7. RELATION: CARRY, CONDUIT, CONDUCT, EXPRESS, CONTAIN, CONSUME.
   
   How something is 'Relayed'. Method of conveyance.
    
8. TOPICAL
   
   SUBJECT, PROCESS, CYCLE, SYSTEM.
   
   The part, place, mechanism or relevance to the defined.
    
9. EXISTENCE
   
   A line connecting above to below. All which exceeds from us.

Helium-3, Water and Electricity - Life

Helium-3 is the planetary equivalent of bone

Helium-3 and water are (essentially) opposites

Electricity is the reversed bridge of water and is therefore a trinary opposite to both water and Helium-3

Electricity is the standing bridge for Hydrogen, which binds them all

Jupiter is the planetary standing bridge. Hydrogen reaction process, that feeds the other planets

Neptune is/of the water for planet Earth. Hence the trident

Pluto is a Bident because it is the polar of the moon. Stabilising the transit between Jupiter, Uranus and Earth

Mars is/of solid phase Earth. Venus is luminous phase Earth. They do not have time baring, except through Earth perception

Saturn is the reversal / Satan

Mercury is the moon and Pluto

Uranus is our atmosphere and pressure. A type of seal for the Earth

Venus and Mars are the eyes of the Earth

Earth, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus are 7 pressure seals for our planet and atmosphere

The/their system reverses on itself from Saturn, through the focus point of the sun

The sun is essentially the entire solar system inside out in phase

The reversed of this, is consciousness

Consciousness is the sun, reflected in exponentially smaller echoes upon echoes, as all forms of life

Life in-turn sustains the flames of the sun

From this, Mercury is very literally the moon. The sun is very literally the Earth

And we are all very literally the sun

Trees and plants, are a reflected version of our light and life, extending out to the planets through/with the sun

If you had a three-point opposite. It would be planets, life, plants (hence plants/planEts)

The most important thing is that plants are a reflection of the stars

The more plants we use, the smaller and darker the entire universe becomes

As it has universal baring on/in our brains, it also means that the more plants we destroy, the less neurons are active in the (average) brain, and the dumber we will get collectively

Atlantis - From A Comment I Removed From The Glitchy Site "Quora" To Post Here Instead

Atlantis is a misunderstood concept. It's not a place, it's a state of being

It does have geological points of reference, but they are nowhere near where people have popularised them to be

If you want a geological location? Google “dolerite pillars Tasmania” and “Cape Hauy” for your “Pillars of Hercules”

Hauy == Hercules. They are different versions of the same word

Cape means: "promontory, piece of land jutting into a sea or lake," late 14c”

“Cape Hauy” is literally “Pillars of Hercules”

Then look at the bodies of water surrounding nearby Port Arthur

Tasmania (Australia/Atlantis) didn't “sink into the sea”, this is a misinterpretation. They simply couldn't find it again. To them, it was lost somewhere across the ocean

The Greek language has been modified in recent history as a “in-between” language for certain religions

This means that allot of translations are close, but not quite correct

You need to remember that allot of translations are done by those who don't understand the concepts, wisdom, etc, that they are translating

Imagine translating documents about physics, when you know nothing about it. How do you compare what you are translating into your own language? You end up with fanciful stories that somewhat make sense, but are none-the-less incorrect

A perfect example of this is those that say a tribe they can barely communicate with told them “That giants from the sky built their civilisation”. They weren't saying this, it was simply a poor understanding of each others language, that developed into acceptable myth over time. Because there were no longer any of those around who originally miscommunicated, to correct the misunderstanding. Future generations are told, “this is what your ancestors told us”, so they accept it as so

Poor understanding and translation, becomes myth, conceived as being born of indefinable fact

The weren't saying “giants”, they were saying “ancestors”. Those greater than themselves that came before. They weren't saying “from the sky”, they were saying “who have left this world”. Exactly the same as we gesture to the heavens for those who have died, still to this day

There are those tribes who look to very particular stars and astrological alignments, but this is only because it correlates somehow directly to where they are on Earth, or a geological location

I can illustrate how the astrological charts line-up with the continent's on Earth. They even have similar names when you line them up. You can move from one town/city to the next, and correlate near identical names on a star chart for locations right next to each other

There are translated texts saying that in ancient ball games, the losing teams would “have their heads cut off” when this is not at all what it says. The texts talk about seasonal championship competitions similar to today's ball games, where the winners “HEAD” the ladder and losers go down the ladder. Hence, “lose their head/lead”

It's plain ridiculous that we believe they would actually cut their heads off. Can you imagine how poor and shallow the talent pool would be in any sport, if we killed one team after each game? And that's on a global scale, let alone a smaller community. You don't kill your talent. It's beyond ridiculous that we actually accept these poor translations still to this day

Imagine if you lived in a house designed and built by your great, great grandparents and you were asked how it was built, when you have no idea

What would your answer be?

Now imagine you had stone pyramids and you had no idea how they are built

Get the idea?

Atlantis is no different. Misunderstood concept

If you understand this, or are at least prepared to try, Atlantis actually means “Intelligence”

Australia, Atlantis, Angel and Annunaki actually all mean the same thing, “Intelligence”

It depends how deep into the Mythos you want to go, because it is all a veil. Nothing more

If you want to look behind the veil, Atlantis is allegory for intelligence

If you want to look at the relative veil concepts, then Atlantis is Australia. More specifically Port Arthur, Tasmania

And regarding the references to Marduk and Anu?

Annunaki means Intelligence

Enki means Conscious

Enki Ea means Conscious Thought

Enlil means Consciousness

Ea is the same word as Theos (said to mean “God”) in the Bible. They are also the same word as Norse Thor and Egyptian Thoth

Ea, Theos, Thor and Thoth all mean Thought

Angel is Intelligence. The same as Australia, Annunaki and Atlantis

Arch Angel is Conscious Intelligence

See the link being Arch and Enki? Near identical words, that have the exact same meaning, “Conscious”

Without looking into the story of Marduk specifically, it appears to be a story of a chemical bodies ability to think outside itself

But I would need to sit down and work out the correlations and meanings of the names specifically

Marduk may be something similar to Mary

The New Testament is a mistranslated (because they didn't understand what they were translating) book of physics

Most old mythology is misunderstood personified concepts of consciousness and being

Egyptian hieroglyphs are some of the best and most accurate sources still available. Unfortunately they are also horribly mistranslated

The Egyptian hieroglyph ⵙ is said to mean Sun or Ra, when it actually means Mind

☥ The Ankh is said to mean Eternal Life, but guess what it really means? Intelligence

A-n-k-h

An-nu-na-ki

Tutankhamun literally means “Translator” which is ironic considering it's mistranslated as the name of a Pharaoh

The most important of the misunderstood translated concepts, that proves the lack of understanding amongst other translated concepts, is The Sumerian Kings List

The Sumerian Kings List is not a list of Kings, it is The Periodic Table Of Elements

If you compare the names in the Kings List and the Periodic Table Of Elements, you will see that some of the so-called Kings names correlate almost identically to their element name

I haven't sat down to correlate the lists yet, it is on my list of things to do some day in the future …

But I assure you, the lists do, and will line up

The most interesting thing about this, is that “The Sumerians” actually have/had a more complete list of elements on their chart(s), then we do today on ours

Lastly, Edgar Cayce seems to polarised on allot of things

There are parts of things he says about the Geography of this world 50,000 years ago (in his book on Atlantis) that I know are incorrect

They are actually the exact opposite of what I know as fact

This (combined with correlating a translated meaning of his name) leads me to believe that allot, if not all of his work, it's actually opposite of likely perceivable truth

I would say if you reversed everything he said, you would be allot closer to truth and/or history

Corn Ethanol Automotive Fuel - Lycose

Stabilise Glucose in creation of corn ethanol after the fuel has been made using A additive substance called Lycose ...

And the fuel will work identically to standard unleaded fuel, without the typical issues associated with ethanol fuels (such as engine wear, etc)

Any unleaded engine should run perfectly and unnoticeably different using corn ethanol with lycose additive

Look at the name to work out how it's chemically made